"Where Do I Stand ?"
The Assigning Philosophy in the WSC
|
Each official who works in the WSC has some kind of ranking, or rating, in the mind of the assignor. This perception of your work is generally arrived at over a period of time, based on many factors. Many officials ask what is expected of them in order to progress to the varsity level. This can be a very difficult question, and the answer may be different for different officials. The most honest answer is that I have a minimum expectation of 1) advancement through the IHSA rankings (if you're just registered, forget it), 2) active membership in a recognized local officials' association, and, 3) generally, several seasons of exceptional work in the conference. These guidelines are not written in concrete, but are generally adhered to. The problem is that, eventually, quite a few good officials meet these requirements. Why are they not all working varsity? It must be understood that only a few varsity openings occur each season. This is because the officials currently working at that level, and getting acceptable ratings, as most do, get first crack at the same number of games each season. If a varsity official is doing a good job in the WSC, I'm not about to take away games from his schedule the following year. The ultimate answer is that to be considered for those few openings that do occur, you must be the best of all the rest. Being "good enough to work the game" is just not good enough. You really are in a one-on-one contest with every other good official at your level. Be patient. Be reliable. Work your way up through the ranks. It generally takes three to five years in a conference to get that first varsity game. Attend your association meetings to learn your rules and attend camps to polish your mechanics. The better you look, and the better game you call, the faster you will progress.
What is the order of progression? In
the WSC the officials' rankings generally go in this order: |
||
|
FROSH: |
||
|
SOPH/JV: A big problem in evaluating soph officials who
are progressing to a varsity schedule is the lack of evaluations
turned in by the soph and JV coaches. If a WSC coach tells you
what a good game you called, encourage him to email me or
use the online evaluation form. (They all have access.) |
||
|
VSUB: It still may be a while before they get a varsity game that is pre-assigned. It's a tough spot to be in. "Do I take a prelim, or do I take a chance and sit home, hoping the phone will ring?" Generally, the more you work, the faster you progress. Progression to the next (VNC) level is
generally based on
varsity-level ratings from WSC coaches or input from other
assignment chairman. |
||
|
VNC:
|
||
|
V1, V2, V3: |
||
|
If you have read this far, I guess you are interested in knowing your own status. I am always willing to share that information with you if you really want to hear it. I never mean to hurt anyone's feelings, but because of the nature of this position, and my approach to it, I am generally honest with officials (some would probably say too honest) and I am not prone to sugarcoat evaluations. Email me and I'll let you know what my current thoughts are. Keep in mind that it's just my opinion. Thanks for showing your interest. |
||
|
Back to Top of Page Back to Assignments Page |